Skip to main content

Not mine, not mine, not mine: Partha Chatterjee on cash seized from Arpita Mukherjee's apartments

 KOLKATA: Sacked Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee Sunday disowned the almost Rs 50-crore cash stash seized from two apartments of his “close associate” Arpita Mukherjee with a dramatic “amar noy, amar noy, amar noy (not mine, not mine, not mine)”.

The denial, coming eight days since his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate, invited an immediate retort from Trinamool Congress, of which he was secretary general until last Thursday. “What took him so long to say this?” party spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said. “When he first had the opportunity, why didn’t he say that this was a conspiracy, and the money wasn’t his? At this rate, he might even say he doesn’t know who Partha Chatterjee is. Or maybe that he doesn’t know Arpita Mukherjee"

Around 1.50pm at the ESI Hospital in Joka, Chatterjee had just alighted from an ED vehicle when a reporter asked him about the ownership of the crores that had been seized from Arpita’s flats. “Shomoy elei bujhe jaben (You will know when the time comes),” he said after denying the money was his.

While iterating that he was the victim of a “conspiracy”, he refused to name anyone who might be framing him.

Earlier, expressing his disappointment at being dropped from the state cabinet and suspended from Trinamool, Chatterjee had said the party's move could impact an "independent probe".

On that occasion, spokesperson Ghosh said the onus was on Chatterjee to prove his innocence. “Let him say whatever he has to say in court. Now evidence, photographs, deeds, fingerprints... everything has surfaced. He should have said this the first time.”

Lok Sabha MP Saugata Roy spoke in the same vein. “He is now in ED custody. There is no importance of such statements made during custody,” he said. “His own doing has brought a bad name to the party. We do not want to give any importance to his statements.”

The ED will produce Chatterjee and Arpita in a Kolkata court on Wednesday.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Womens And Girls Are Really Safe In INDIA??

 ● Women safety in India:-   According to 'Times of India's' report India is one of the most unsafe countries in the world🌎  in woman's safety .  It ranks 133 out of 167 countries in the world in women safety. It is really Disappointing.  In india at every 20 minutes a girl is raped. Who knows maybe a girl is being raped in somewhere In India while you are reading this . ● Here are some cruel rape cases in India from 2012 to 2020:-  ■ 2012 Delhi, 16 Dec 2012, Nirbhaya Gang rape by 6 people  including a juvenile ■2013 Mumbai, 22.Aug.2013, Shakti Mills Gang rape by 5 people including a juvenile ■2014 UP, 27.May.2014, Badaun Gang rape by up to 7 people(suspects) ■2015 Tamil Nadu, July 2015, Shivgangai minor girl rape case Accused a police officer ■2016 Rajasthan, 29.March.2016, Delta Meghwal rape case 17yrs old girl accused her hostel teacher. ■2017 UP,  04.Jun.2017 , Unnao rape case A minor girl raped. ■2018 Jammu Kashmir , Jan.2018,  Kathua Rape Case Minor girl raped by

Journalism And Indian Politics.....

' Journalism ' a wonderful word that symbolize a neutral political ideologist person who stands for common peoples and raise their voices against anything which was done worng or it is going to be done worng.  Some neutral political ideologist journalist who are holding the original ideology of journalism strongly, they are -  ■  Ravish kumar ■  Punya Prasun Bajpai ■  Abhisar Sharma This are some journalists who follows the original ideology of journalism. This peoples have the guts to say fearless which is right and which is worng. We respect them for their incredible work in the field of journalism.  There was a time when journalism seems to be a respectful occupation in the past. Now a days the scenario is slightly changed.  Now a days very few journalists left who are still holding the original ideology of journalism strongly. Like - Ravish kumar, Punya Prasun Bajpai, Abhisar Sharma, But a majority number of journalists didn't follows the original ideology of journalism